Psalm 95

Lent 3 - Year A


The waters of creation, divided and constrained, remain an opportunity for temptation. In the midst of choice (often chaotic -- otherwise, what seemed like a choice would be resolved into a non-choice for one side or the other) we look for certainty. Is G*D in favor of this way of walking and talking in the cool of the evening or in favor of a different way? Will we get our daily water on our own terms or as a gift or not at all? When up against thirst won't we do just about anything to guarantee access to cool, clear water?

At Jacob's well or dry Meribah, tests and quarrels are available to be given and argued. The decisions and broken trusts made in times of stress hang on for a long time. Even G*D gets caught up in the temptations and makes 40-year long angers and keeps suspicion regarding changed generations alive for even longer. No one rests easy during thirsty times, no matter how well provisioned they are for the moment.

Is there any propitiation for sin that will mollify a G*D angered by the thirst of said G*D's creatures? How can such a G*D grow up to not be so easily offended when their dream creation goes awry? How can such a people grow up to not be so easily thirsty for eternal life right here, right now?

http://www.kairoscomotion.org/lectionary/2005/february2005.html

 


 

Psalm 95
Exodus 17:1-7
Romans 5:1-11
John 4:5-42

"Give us water to drink," quarreled the people with Moses.
"Salvation is present in rocky ground!" rejoices the Psalmist.
"Peace with G*D," is Paul's lifeblood.
"Give me a drink," focuses Jesus' challenge.

An old standard is 6-8 glasses of water per day. In a world of increasing ecological disaster and civilian-oriented warfare, even 1 glass a day is a challenge in many places.

A next war may be fought over water rights. Quarrels have already begun about water's availability. It may be that where folks literally thirst for life - they will rise to take the life of those who withhold such a basic necessity.

Such physical realities have cosmos-wide implications. We can't separate water gushing up for eternal life from water gushing up for daily life. These are not just religious, theological, doctrinal passages, but political and prophetic ones. If you have not already been called to use your gifts and resources in some other arena of life, this would be a worthy place to engage to see if this is for you and your life-giving community.

- - -

water
water everywhere
drinks on the house
bottoms up
filled to the brim

water
water everywhere
rights to be wrangled
dams to build
levees to rebuild

water
water everywhere
and yet thirst
and yet division
and yet ignorance

water
water everywhere
water in rocks
water in wells
water in star dust

water
water everywhere
ho, come to the water
dive deep
until a spell is snapt

water
water everywhere
watering prayers
watering love
with sips and gulps

water
water everywhere
and not a god to drink
then a little vesper bell
rings out a change

water
water everywhere
staff to rock
voice to ear
salvation saved

suggested by a Wikipedia article Info about The Rime of the Ancient Mariner

Fulford, Tim, "Poetry of Isolation: The Ancient Mariner," Coleridge's Figurative Languages (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991), 62-73.
Fulford analyses the composition of the poem's discourses in the context of the assumptions of the historical biblical hermeneutics with which Coleridge was familiar. Fulford argues that the poem's discourses disrupt the hermeneutic circle of believers posited by biblical hermeneutics, and illustrate the isolating freedom provided by an exegesis discontinuous with tradition. Historical biblical hermeneutics attempts to deal with the problem posed by the finitude and historicity of interpretation. By positing a grand unity of perspective in God, historical biblical hermeneutics can deny the inerrancy of scripture (an embarrassingly untenable notion) while placing each sacred text in a cirle with other spiritual interpretations of existence authority, a circle which progresses toward though never reaching the circumscription of truth. Spiritual authority thus rests in a continually reinterpreted tradition of spiritual texts. McGann and Butler argue that Coleridge organizes the multiple levels of discourse in his poem to create such a hermeneutic circle: the Mariner interprets his own experience; his interpretation is affirmed but reinterpreted by the poem's narrator, the balladeer; the narrator's reinterpretation is deepened by the scholarly author of the gloss, who typologically integrates the poem into the tradition of Christian hermeneutics; critics such as Warren perpetuate the circle with their interpretations of the poem, which are modernizations and expansions upon the gloss. Fulford argues that the poem is more problematic than either McGann or Butler perceive it to be. The poem brings together, not in unity but in collision, radically discontinuous hermeneutic discourses; the poem breaks the hermeneutic circle. The Mariner's interpretation of his experience cannot be reduced to the narrator's moralizing or the glosser's typological interpretation. As in "The Wanderings of Cain," in "The Mariner" traditional interpretations of guilt and punishment are destabilized by the poem's sypathetic treatment of the Mariner. The tension thus created between the Mariner's tale, the narrator, and the gloss is left unresolved. Furthermore, the Mariner himself breaks with hermeneutic tradition when he denies the Christian interpretation of the albatross and shoots it. His interpretation of the consequent events disconfirms the hermeneutic circle: through imagination the Mariner creates an interpretation of reality as chaos which is incompatible with the unifying assumption of the hermeneutic circle. His fate as a misunderstood prophet outside of society expresses the radically isolating consequences of the dissolution of the hermeneutic circle into the babble of competing discourses. Even the glosses are fissured by the incompatibility of the various interpretive discourses the glosser draws from the hermeneutic tradition and puts into play in the poem. The unity of the poem's hermeneutic circle is on the verge of collapsing into the fragments of a forced appearance. The poem does not capitulate entirely to radical discontinuity, but suffers intensely from the strain, created by the movements toward unity on the one hand and dissolution on the other, which is inevitable in all hermeneutic endeavors.

http://kcmlection.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html


 

On what mountain do you find salvation/health/wholeness? Is it Mt. Zion or Mt. Gerizim? Might it be the mountain or rock that Moses struck to bring forth living, flowing water?

Even that rock became a stumbling block, keeping Moses and the people from entering the rest of a promised-land (compare with Numbers 20:1-13 as the source of G*D's rejection of Moses regarding entry to Canaan - Deuteronomy 32:48-52).

Sing, rejoice, do not harden your heart to the impossibilities before you. This is part of the Lenten testing or temptation – to not personalize every trial and complain when life is not "fair" to you and yours. How do we simply die or keep on moving ahead until we do?

http://kcmlection.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html

 


 

Good ol' G*D wants to be proved once for all. Don't test G*D or you'll get it in the neck or somewhere. One test in the desert will keep you out of a land of milk and honey. See, don't test G*D. And we want to yell, "I'll stop testing you when you stop testing me!"

Or, more moderately, we might say, "Relationships are always being tested for how else could there be growth of each part and the whole." We wonder why the mood swings of G*D. Is there not enough lithium in usable form for G*D? How much can we keep new creations from crossing our mind and being followed even should we be threatened with destruction? There is something about our being in the image of G*D that keeps us pushing the boundaries. Or perhaps it is just the kid in us learning as we go.

Mystery I can abide. Rules without reason are not helpful. Rules that run contrary to experience are hurtful. A rule of not testing G*D is unconscionable, it is not part of our original job description. How else would one know if G*D has grown past a past response? How else do we find what image is our image?

Blessings upon your testings (both those your receive and those you make).

http://kcmlection.blogspot.com/2011/03/psalm-95.html

 


 

About what is your anger swearing these day. G*D’s swearing during the Exodus extended the time between Egypt and an Utopian Promised Land. The journey went from a straight line to a generational wandering.

This is a fine example of a negative swear. “Not you!”

It is more difficult to have a positive swear. “No matter what, You!”

This is part of our journey, opening a way where there seemed to be nothing that could be done. This usually entails some behavioral change on our part and a commitment to continue saying yes to a needed change, regardless of the obstacles.

I’ve been pleased to be part of the Love Prevails part of Kairos CoMotion that has a positive swearing that if we Disclose(t) the consequences of discrimination, Divest providing resources that prop up divisive theologies, and Disrupt the silence about the way we hurt one another, then an Affirmative Land will help us be better together.

What kind of swearing are you doing today?

http://kcmlection.blogspot.com/2014/03/psalm-95.html